Ice Fishing fairness check
Across 98,191 recorded rounds, Ice Fishing is statistically consistent with its published figures.
All recorded rounds, judged together with every other check on the monitor.
| Check | Measured (95% range) | Stated | Rounds | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole wheel5 outcomes, chi-square 0.2 on 4 degrees of freedom | p 0.99 | Published layout | 98,191 | Consistent |
| Leaf 1 | 43.37% (43.06 to 43.68) | 43.40% | 98,191 | Consistent |
| Leaf 2 | 43.43% (43.12 to 43.74) | 43.40% | 98,191 | Consistent |
| Lil' Blues | 7.519% (7.356 to 7.686) | 7.547% | 98,191 | Consistent |
| Big Oranges | 3.786% (3.669 to 3.908) | 3.774% | 98,191 | Consistent |
| Huge Reds | 1.897% (1.814 to 1.985) | 1.887% | 98,191 | Consistent |
How we calculate this
How often each result lands is compared with the published wheel or table layout (a chi-square test across all results, plus each result on its own). Where our recorded rounds price a bet exactly, its return per 1 staked is measured with a 95% range from 2,000 resamples of the rounds, and compared with the provider's published RTP.
Every check gets a two-sided p-value. Because 177 checks run on this monitor at once, the p-values are corrected with the Holm method before a result counts as not consistent (corrected p below 0.01). A result with an uncorrected p below 0.01 is shown as borderline. These thresholds are set in advance and are the same for every game. Full method.